The ruling on whoever sold used Gold and did not receive the Price, and then he purchased new Gold while just paying the Difference

Question :

What is the ruling concerning whoever sold gold to the owner of a shop, and then he bought other gold from the owner of the shop with an amount close to the amount for which he sold his gold to him, for example? Then he pays the shop owner the value of the gold that he bought from the value of the gold that he sold to him while not actually receiving the money for his gold.

Answer:

This is not permissible, because if he sold something for a price that he did not receive, and then he took something in place of its price that it is not permissible to sell on credit, the Fiqh scholars have clearly declared this to be forbidden. This is because he has taken a means of deception to sell what is not permissible to sell on credit by this method of not receiving payment. If it (the gold) is of the same type, it becomes a deceitful way of practicing Riba Al-Fadhl and Riba An-Nasi'ah.

Read more:

The General President for the Administrations of Scientific Researches, Religious Verdicts, Preaching and Guidance

The ruling on presenting Gifts to those who purchase a specified Value of Goods ...

There is no Limit for the increase in Sales for delayed (Credit) Payment

Question : If a man has a bag of sugar that is sold up front for 80 riyals, and ...

The Ruling on Heirs Dividing up the Endowment of Their Grandfather When its Benefit Ceases

Question :A person named Sa'id donated a small piece of land as an endowment and...

Another Fatwa concerning the Issue of At-Tawarruq

Question : A man seeks a loan from another man for the sum of 10,000 riyals on t...