Muslim food culture

Halal: Dietary Law, Trust, Intention, and Trade

Halal, meaning permissible, refers to food products that are declared edible and permissible under Islamic dietary law. However, the guidelines that govern halal are not fixed intime nor geographically homogenous. As historians of Islam have shown, the early Quranic prescriptions were, in fact, rather rudimentary about what constitutes halal and referonly to prohibitions on swine, carrion, and meat that has been dedicated to other Gods(Cook 1986). Other verses do implore Muslims to eat that upon which the name of Godhas been uttered (Qur'an 6:118). However, there appears no deliberation about when andhow the name of God should be performed. Later, as Islam expanded, new elements of halal practice came to reflect regional and sectarian concerns as birds, reptiles, and crustaceans were drawn into halal (Cook 1986). With the establishment of Hadith scholarshipand the development of a formalized Sharia, the procedures of slaughter were stipulatedand prescribed.

All Rights Reserved. Personal use only; commercial use is strictly prohibited (for details see PrivacyPolicy and Legal Notice).

According to a very basic understanding, halal requires that the animal be placed on theground in the direction of Mecca. The knife should be sharp. The tasmiya (the pronunciation of bisillah-allahu-akbar before slaughter) is recited and two arteries are severed. Theanimal should neither see the knife before slaughter nor should it witness the slaughterof other animals. These aspects of halal practice are attributed to the Hadith (theProphetic traditions) and are considered best practice, rather than obligatory. Indeed, thediversity of sources, the categorization of practice into obligatory (fard) and recommended (sunnat), and the paucity of Quranic reference means that a great diversity of opinionsof what actually constitutes halal continue to exist. Different groups across the world emphasize certain aspects of halal as more crucial than others. However, differences in practice are not merely evidence of personal preference or a desire for transgression. Authoritative texts are ambiguous about many aspects of the application of halal, meaning thatscholarly attempts to explain Muslim practice as evidence of conformity and transgression or obligation and individualization are difficult to sustain. This becomes all the moreimportant when different actors all profess to be practicing halal, albeit in diverse and often contradictory ways.

Two authoritative debates worth noting are the reference to the ahl-al-kitab (people of the book, who in the Qur'an refers to Christians and Jews), as well as Hadith narrations that discuss the timing of the prayer upon slaughter. For example, in Surah Maida, 5:2:

This day [all] good foods have been made lawful, and the food of those who weregiven the Scripture is lawful for you and your food is lawful for them.

According to this verse, the food of the ahl-al-kitab is halal. Indeed, there are contemporary commentators who have added caveats to the permissibility of the food of the peopleof the book (ahl-al-kitab). For example, in both South Africa and India, the ulama (legalscholars) are almost unanimous in the conclusion that modernity has rendered most people religious only by name. They therefore suggest that the waywardness of the ahl-alkitab is a sufficient cause for not accepting their food. Others argue that the slaughterwould have to have been performed in the halal method (without severing the spine), withthe name of God recited upon slaughter (tasmiya). Indeed, both caveats seek to limit thepractice of halal within Muslim networks. However, the presence of the verse remains animportant source for a liberal application of halal practice in the contemporary world.

Another highly regarded source for practice is the Hadith narration of Imam Malik. In hisMuwatta, Malik compiled a list of the earliest Hadiths recorded. Two of the narrations refer to scenarios that mention the timing of pronunciation of the tasmiya. The two narrations appear in this order:

Yahya related to me from M lik from Hisham ibn Urwa that his father said, "TheMessenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, was asked, 'Messenger of Allah! Some people from the desert bring us meat, and we do not knowwhether the name of Allah has been mentioned over it or not.' The Messenger of Allah ﷺ, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, 'Mention the name of Allahover it and eat.' Mälik said, "That was in the beginning of Islam.'

Yahya related to me from Mälik from Yahya ibn Said that Abdullah ibn Ayyash ibnAbi Rabia al Makhzumi ordered one of his slaves to slaughter an animal. When hewanted to slaughter it, he said to him, "Mention Allah's name." The slave said tohim, "I have mentioned the name!" He said to him, "Mention the name of Allah,bother you!" He said to him, "I have mentioned the name of Allah." Abdullah ibnAyyash said, "By Allah, I shall never eat it!" (Malik 2000, 327)

In the first narration, the prophet instructs his companions (sahaba) to eat the food of unknown origin as long as the name of God is recited before consumption. In the secondnarration, it was a companion of the prophet who became disgusted with the idea of eating meat over which the tasmiya may have been omitted at the time of slaughter. Thereappears to have been a difference of opinion regarding the timing of the tasmiya, at thetime of slaughter, or at the time of consumption.

A contemporary online fatwa website gives a sense of the complexity at the heart of sucha seemingly simple and straightforward issue. Islamqa.info is a website that offers readers advice on a variety of Islamic issues. In response to a question about the permissibility of the food of the people of the book, the author references the verse from Surah Maidah (The Table). However, his solution is not straightforward. First, he asserts the requirement that the meat should be slaughtered according to the halal method, and that thename of God be uttered. Second, the animal should not have been slaughtered via nonpermissible methods such as strangling or death by a blow. And third, that the animal hasnot been slaughtered in the name of a competing deity. Following this advice, the authorthen considers the case of meat where the method of slaughter is unknown. He refers toa Prophetic tradition where the Prophet ordered his companions to "Mention the name ofAllah upon it and eat it" (Al-Munajjid 1997). In this discussion, we see that in the absenceof proof about the timing of slaughter, halal is produced through the utterance upon consumption rather than slaughter.

Although there are fairly clear ideas of what constitutes halal, there are also authoritativeavenues for practice that complicate straightforward understandings. From this discussion, the question of evidence seems to be crucial in determining whether meat is halal ornot. The ruling suggests that in the absence of evidence, the recitation of the tasmiya upon consumption is permitted.

The incredibly complex discourse on halal includes particular forms of reasoning regarding the link between ritual practice, evidence, and performance, with insights into the authoritative resources upon which halal practice may draw. However, despite the density ofhalal discourse, Muslims in many parts of the world continue to refer to halal as if it isuniform and straightforward. In everyday life, individuals do not always query the exact -interpretation of halal before determining whether to consume or not. The key to under standing halal in practice therefore necessitates a consideration of the link between sin,salvation, and niyyat (intention) within Muslim networks of trade.

Trust, Intention, and Intra-Muslim Trade

In practice, the consumer of halal meat is usually not the supplier nor the actual butcher.Given the chain of responsibility necessary for the practice of halal, trust is central. A halal rule of thumb considers that supply by a fellow Muslim constitutes halal. In the eventthat a Muslim supplier knowingly provides a non-halal item, the consumer is absolved ofsin. If both supplier and consumer are ignorant about the non-halal status of a food product, then both are exempt. Importantly, it is considered undesirable (makrüh) for a Muslim to doubt the halal status of the food of another Muslim. In the absence of clear evidence of transgression or devious behavior, halal practice is assured through the intention (niyyat) to consume within Muslim networks of trade. Niyyat as orientation, disposition, and taxonomic categorization of ritual practice in Islam (Powers 2004) thus emergesas crucial to the production and consumption of halal. Divergent interpretations of halalare often sidelined by a communal notion of trust that considers niyyat (intention) within.Muslim networks of trade as central for practice.

The communally charged notion of trust that is central to the practice of halal, however,is always ripe for the emergence of sectarian conflict through the denial of the food ofother groups. In a richly layered text, Freidenreich (2011) has offered an analysis of theprogressive sectarian impulse in the development of medieval Islamic dietary law. However, in the absence of clear conflict or sectarian strife, signs of Muslim identity such asfirst names, dress, and images of sacred sites or symbols serve as signifiers of halal. Trustin halal is assured through trade and consumption with fellow Muslims, supported by aparticular notion of niyyat (intention), salvation, and sin.

Halal Certification: Global Trade, Cross-Contamination, and Food Technology

In recent decades, developments in trade and finance have complicated Muslim consumption within Muslim-only networks. For example, it is now possible for Muslims in Americato purchase halal-slaughtered Australian lamb chops from the local Walmart. Importantly,the transformation in the material conditions of trade has been accompanied by the increasing sophistication and opacity of food technology. Enzymes, flavorants, and colorings from animal sources are commonly used in otherwise innocuous household itemsthat range from yoghurt and sweets to chocolates and even bottled water. Now, neitherthe purchase of meat from Muslim sources nor the consumption of non-meat items necessarily ensures halal. The complexity of global supply may evade the scope of a Muslim retailer. And the chemical composition of manufactured food products requires expert supply chain management and even DNA testing to determine the exact source of ingredients. Together, these developments have both complicated the supply of halal and given birth to a halal certification industry that seeks to assure the practice of halal on a globalscale even in non-Muslim contexts (Tayob 2012). A halal certification industry hasemerged that has altered but not completely suppressed the earlier practice and discourse of halal.

The halal certification industry seeks to assure the practice of halal in a global consumermarket in a bid to ensure the documentary regulation and audit of halal practice on a -global scale (Fischer 2016). However, it is important to recognize that the changes to halal introduced by certification amount to much more than a simple coming together of halal practice, global trade, corporate culture, and scientific testing. A closer look at theshifts entailed by the certification industry point to substantive transformations of language, materiality, and ethical practice.

Halal certification emphasizes two novel arenas of activity as risks to the integrity of halal. The first is cross-contamination, which is understood as the possibility for halal andnon-halal items to come into physical contact with each other at any point during manufacture, distribution, or supply. Mitigating the risk of cross-contamination requires detailed supply chain management to ensure separate spaces, utensils, and vehicles. Thesecond is the focus on food technology. Here the industry focuses on ingredients listingand production processes as crucial for determining the halal status of manufacturedfood. Food technologists and DNA tests are employed in a bid to establish material certainty over all food and even non-food items. Central to this twin development is the notion that the material certainty of halal can and should be established. Halal practice removed from Muslim networks of trade can no longer rely on surface signs of Muslim identity. Rather, the industry now emphasizes molecular certainty and supply chain management as key to the global certification of halal.

Halal is thus extended from concern with permissible animals and meat toward all itemsof Muslim consumption and use. The twin developments of cross-contamination and foodtechnology necessarily require a level of expert knowledge that exceeds the scope of theindividual Muslim consumer and supplier. Certification organizations comprised of scientific experts and ulama (legal scholars) conduct halal audits in a bid to regulate theemerging terrain of "molecular halal" (Tayob 2019).

The new conditions of halal consumption and trade have given rise to new opportunities,anxieties, and concerns. Malaysian Muslim consumers in London consume Malaysian-certified halal products as a way of asserting their national identity (Fischer 2008). In bothFrance and the United Kingdom, Muslim groups argue for the right to consume halal thatdovetails with consumer trends in organic and free-range labeling (Bergeaud-Blackler2007). Also important are the ways in which the practice or contravention of halal in China is tied to global aspirations for living a middle-class consumer lifestyle (Gillette 2005).And in South Africa, certification mediates new kinds of ethical relations as certified consumption becomes articulated with personal piety (taqwa) (Tayob 2016). New research into the expansion of halal certification across the world will shed further insights on the transformations through which a predominantly local and communal practice of halalconsumption enters the global consumer market economy.

However, contrary to predictions of a uniform and totalizing neoliberal transformation ofhalal, evidence suggests that much of the diversity and complexity of halal practice continues. Indeed, Muslims around the world continue to draw on a pre-certification notionof halal premised on intra-Muslim trade, even in global markets. The authoritative discussions on the timing of the tasmiya, the food of the people of thbook (ahl-al-kitab), andconsumption within Muslim networks of trade continueserve asimportant resourcefor ethical deliberation through which to consume. The picture is less an issue of totaltransformation than a series of developments and negotiations by Muslims around theworld as they grapple with and profit from the new conditions of global trade and scientific food production. Here again, one is reminded of the insights of Talal Asad, that a discursive tradition "is simply a tradition of Muslim discourse that addresses itself to conceptions of the Islamic past and future, with reference to a particular Islamic practice inthe present" (Asad 1986, 14). The practice of a discursive tradition refers not to blind repetition, but rather to the waywhich authoritative sources and notions of the good arearticulated and expressedparticular contexts.

Barakat: Food Practice Beyond Halal

Given that halal practice is assured through networks of Muslim trade, the explicit concern over halal foodMuslim majority contexts is heavily circumscribed. In fact, it is notuncommon for Muslims in majority contexts to claim ignorance about halal or proclaim itas superfluous (Graf 2016). This has led some scholars to fearful and simplistic conclusions aboutainvention of halal in order to make a link between fundamentalism andhalal certification (Bergeaud-Blackler 2017). More important isrecognize that in majority contexts where the emphasis on halal is subdued, it is possible to observe how foodfeatures as a good that is imbued with ethical value. For example, the annual month ofRamadan and the two festivals of Id are marked by the preparation, sharing, and distribution of food. Other times ofweek or year with religious significance are often markedabyconsumptionparticular foods. This section draws attention to some ofshared discursive and material notions of barakat as articulated through food practicesby Muslims across the world. More detailed ethnographies of how the notion of barakat ispracticed, transformed, and negotiated in everyday life are required in order to illuminate this central aspect of Muslim everyday life.

Barakat, as divine grace, blessing, and power, is an important notion through which ingestion and food obtain ethical value. Barakat is commonly ascribed to holy places andholy people and can be transferred to others through physical contact or pilgrimage (Jennings 1991, 547). In Morocco, West Africa, and Southern Egypt, it is held that the barakatof a holy man canimbibed throughashared ingestion of food (Hunwick 2017; Westermarck 1933). Participants may attend a zikr, or at least share in the ceremonial food asa means of obtaining barakat (Jennings 1991, 548).1 The link between God's blessings and food may translate into a desireengage in elaborate food preparations to mark important events such as weddings, funerals, and Id celebrations. For some scholars, the linkbetween barakat and food is so strong asposition sharing and food preparation as a pious act (Shirazi 2015). However, as will be seen, the association of barakat to piety is limiting. Barakat, as power, grace, and blessing, is far more capacious than the notion ofpiety as intentional self-cultivation (Mahmood 2011). It is more useful to think aboutbarakat as a "divine excess" that is both transferred and produced through acts of kindness, sharing, almsgiving, comradery, and good will (Mittermaier 2013, 285).

Ramadan: Fasting and Feasting

Ramadan is the annual month of fasting in the Islamic calendar that brings consumptioninto sharp focus. During the month, Muslims are obligated to fast from just before sunriseuntil sunset. According to a dominant normative understanding, fasting is considered anaustere disciplinary practice through which pious subjectivity is cultivated (Schielke2009). Practitioners are advised to control their thoughts, gaze, and words during themonth. Extra prayers are performed in the evenings and Qur'an recitation is encouraged.However, Ramadan is not solely about fasting, prayer, and reflection. Indeed, as scholarsof Christianity have noted, fasting, feasting, and feeding are all intimately related (Bynum2013, 277). Islam is no exception. Each year, global news outlets feature photo articlesdocumenting the elaborate evening meal preparations and all-night markets that are acommon feature across the Muslim world (ABC News 2018). Indeed, the repeated injunctions by religious leaders to pray more and eat less is evidence of the strong associationof Ramadan with feasting, sharing, and celebration (Tayob 2017).

Appreciating the importance of food during Ramadan means returning to the notion ofbarakat as blessing. Ramadan is considered a month of "great blessings" that may be understood to reside in prayer, food, friendship, and trade. Ramadan is a month that witnesses an increase in "permissible" consumption, of which the largest portionspent onfood (Tobin 2013, 304). In India and elsewhere, late-night markets preparing and servingspecial delicacies attract thousands of visitors. The blessings of Ramadan are evident inthe variety of tastes on offer. Preparing food and sharing food are key to these Ramadancelebrations and are also considered a form of righteous activity during the month (Tayob2017, 151-175).

A popular prophetic injunction offers a reward (sawab) to anyone who feeds a fasting person the sunset meal (iftar).2 Articulating feeding as a virtuous act translates into a desireto share food with friends, neighbors, and the poor. Both piety and charity are thereforeemphasized during the month (Khare and Rao 1986). This is most evident during theevening meal that marks the end of the fasting day (iftar). For many people, the satisfaction, taste, and joy of the recipient is evidence of barakat (blessings) transferred throughfood.

Acts of gifting are always opportunities for display ,status and hierarchy (Mauss 2002).
Who gives what and when are not overtly advertised but nevertheless become associated with particularly prominent individuals and families. Across the world, mosques provideiftar meals for congregations funded by nation-states, traders, and politicians. In Mumbai, certain mosques are known for serving particularly scrumptious iftar meals, regularly attributed to the generosity of the donor. Local politicians are famous for marking themonth with "iftar parties" where excellent food and an A-list Bollywood guest list are regular features. The exact form of iftar celebrations is, of course, not predetermined, butdepend on local contexts, political formations, and economic developments. For example,in Istanbul, the confluence between an increasingly neoliberal consumer economy and Ottoman nostalgia converge around the "iftar table" at high-end restaurants, special shopping festivals, and even fast-food outlets. There too, the hosting of iftar events is implicated in the broader economics and politics of the city (Karaosmanoglu 2010). However, toreduce these particular forms of iftar celebration to contextual economic and political developments is to ignore the longer duration view of how discursive and material practicesinherited from the past are transformed and reanimated in the contemporary world.

Qurbani: Sacrifice, Slaughter, Sharing

Id-ul-Adha is another major festival of the Islamic calendar. Id-ul-Adha marks the end ofthe annual Hajj pilgrimage and commemorates the willingness of the Prophet Ibrahim(Abraham) to sacrifice his son Ismail (Ishmael) in lieu of God's orders. At the last moment, in exchangeIbrahim's submission, God placed a ram in Ismail's place. Ismailwas saved and the ram slaughtered. Annually, Muslims around the world commemoratethe great sacrifice of Ibrahim by dedicating a ram, sheep, goat, ox, or camel for slaughter.After slaughter, one third of the meat is reserved for the household, one third for friendsand family, and one third for the poor. Clearly the practice of sacrifice is imbricated inpractices of piety and submission as well as economics, market exchange, gifting, sociality, and feasting.

Actual practices of sacrifice (Qurbani) differ significantly across the world. For example,during the Hajj, animals are transported across long distances to service the needs of themillions of pilgrims who visit Mecca each year. In Morocco, the significance of the sacrifice is reinforced and appropriated through official state displays of power (CombsSchilling 1990). In India, where no official state sanction obtains, the idea of sacrifice islinked to questions of care and attachment to the sacrificial animal before slaughter (Tayob 2017, 122-150). Much like in Indonesia, the practice of sacrificeclosely tiedthedistributionmeat such that gifting and sacrifice are always intimately related (Bowen1993; Mauss and Hubert 1964). However, sacrifice does not have to be performed in person, and it is increasingly common for Muslims to dedicate a sacrificial animal to a pooror war-torn region. In these instances, local religious organizations or global intermediaries, such as Islamic Relief, ensure the performance of the sacrifice and distribution ofthe meat in exchange for a fee. Here too, an established notion of barakat as blessing, sacrifice, and gifting is transformed in the context of a global economy of finance, poverty, and welfare.

Future research should pay attention to the way in which new discussions surroundinganimal welfare, environmental sustainability, and middle-class consumer lifestyles giverise to new discursive and material articulations of sacrifice by Muslims in different contexts.

Food , Medicine and Healing

Historically, there are close associations between food and healing. The unani (lit. Greek)medical system, practiced across the Muslim worldahundreds of years, clearly articulates a link between food, healing, and authoritative religious sources (Alavi 2008). Theunani medical systembased on a humoral theory of the body combined with propheticdietary practice. Popular products considered medicinally beneficial and prophetically inspired include dates, milk, and honey. These and similar food products are prescribed formedicinal benefits while at the same time thought to contain and transmit prophetic wisdom. Close attention to the way in which Muslims discuss, consume, and prepare theseauthorized and preferred food products has not been extensive and deserves more attention. Particularly interesting is the revival of unani by middle-class Muslims as an alternativeWestern medical practices.

The link between religion and healing extends beyond foodinclude the power ofQuranic verse and prayer. Richard and Nancy Tapper found that among Durrani Pashtuns, food consumption extended beyond religion to include health, honor, and magic(Tapper and Tapper 1986). In their analysis of magic, they refer to a common practice of"a mulla writing Koranic verse on a paper that is then eatenthe ink washed off anddrunk" (Tapper and Tapper 1986, 73). Similarly, in Darfur (Sudan), it has been notedamong the Berti Muslim group that individuals consult with specialists (faki) to haveOuranic verse written onto a wooden tablet. The ink is then washed off with water and ingested (El-Tom 1985). Prescriptions include everything: "an illness, starting a business,getting involved in a dispute, setting out on a journey, etc." (El-Tom 1985, 417). Interestingly, during the 1980s when El-Tom carried out the research, he noted that practitionersin Darfur consulted manuals imported from across the Islamic world, from "Egypt, Iran,Lebanon and Saudi Arabia" (El-Tom 1985. 416).

A similar practice in South Asia involves the prayers of a holy person or family memberwhich are then blown onto a vessel of water. The water, thus transformed into holy water,is considered powerful and offered to the ill. Also common is for visitors to a local shrineto place an empty bottle of water in front of the tomb for a period of time while prayersare performed. The bottle is then collected and taken home to be offered to a sick familymember as a healing cure. Given the advent of allopathic theories of medicine, there is often skepticism about the efficacy of these traditional forms of healing. And of course, reformers are quick to judge these practices as superstitious and un-Islamic. However, as a healing practice, they continue as important ways in which Muslims link health, ingestion, and faith.

Opportunities for Future Research

The significance of food in everyday Muslim life is undeniable. However, to date the studyof food has suffered from an overdetermination of Islam with piety. This means that notions of charity, gifting, and community, authorized by the discursive tradition of Islamicpractice and thought, are sidelined. This article provides an overview of some of the avenues through which to explore the significance and complexity of food as embedded inMuslim social life.

Halal certification has in recent decades emerged as a significant global phenomenonthat introduces new opportunities and challenges for Muslim trade and consumption. Understanding certification necessitates a consideration of the way in which older practicesof halal, rooted in intra-Muslim trade, are transformed, displaced, or resist the new demands of certification, technological food production, and global trade. The notion ofbarakat is important for thinking of Islam beyond austere piety in a bid to capture muchaof the capaciousness and celebratory aspects of Islam around the world. However, as anthropologists, it is important to remember that the way in which barakat as blessing is deployed and articulated requires very careful investigation of the changes and shifts in society, within which practices, expressions, and food preparations are always embedded.For example, in America, food preparation and consumptionAfrican American Muslims is intimately related to a history of slavery and the way in which that memory is valorized or rejected (Rouse and Hoskins 2004). Similarly, in South Africa, Malay Muslimfood culture articulates links between gender, memory, class, and a history of slavery(Baderoon 2007; Baderoon 2002; Baderoon, 2009). The overview in this article thereforeis best considered a signpost through which to investigate the particular ways in which adiscursive tradition of past text and practice is articulated and materialized in differenteconomic, political, and social contexts across the contemporary world.

Read more: